|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Large Emergency-Response Exercises: Qualitative Characteristics - A Survey
Yang-Im Lee*,
Peter Trim,
Julia Upton,
and
David Upton
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: yang-im.lee{at}rhul.ac.uk.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Exercises, drills, or simulations are widely used, by governments, agencies and commercial organizations, to simulate serious incidents and train staff how to respond to them. International cooperation has led to increasingly large-scale exercises, often involving hundreds or even thousands of participants in many locations. The difference between large and small exercises is more than one of size: (a) Large exercises are more experiential and more likely to undermine any model of reality that single organizations may create; (b) they create a play space in which organizations and individuals act out their own needs and identifications, and a ritual with strong social implications; (c) group-analytic psychotherapy suggests that the emotions aroused in a large group may be stronger and more difficult to control. Feelings are an unacknowledged major factor in the success or failure of exercises; (d) successful large exercises help improve the nature of trust between individuals and the organizations they represent, changing it from a situ-ational trust to a personal trust; (e) it is more difficult to learn from large exercises or to apply the lessons identified; (f) however, large exercises can help develop organizations and individuals. Exercises (and simulation in general) need to be approached from a broader multidisciplinary direction if their full potential is to be realized.
First published on October 22, 2009, doi:10.1177/1046878109334006
Simulation & Gaming 2009;40:726.
A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2009
This version was published on November
5, 2009

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|