Simulation & Gaming

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Byrnes, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kiger, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Simulation & Gaming, Vol. 23, No. 4, 485-489 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/1046878192234008

Prejudice-Reduction Simulations: Notes on their Use and Abuse a Reply to Williams and Giles

Deborah A. Byrnes

Utah State University

Gary Kiger

Utah State University

This article is a reply to a critique by Williams and Gils of a previous article on prejudice-reduction simulations. The three areas of concern include the ethics of conducting prejudice-reduction simulations, the evaluation of simulation effectiveness, and the correspondence between social psychological theory and simulation practice.

Key Words: ethics • prejudice • simulations


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?