Simulation & Gaming

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saliés, T. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Simulation & Gaming, Vol. 33, No. 3, 316-329 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/104687810203300306

Simulation/Gaming in the EAP Writing Class: Benefits and Drawbacks

Tânia Gastão Saliés

Pontifícia Universidade Católica, do Rio de Janeiro

This study describes an integrated use of simulation/gaming in an English for Academic Purposes class, analyzes its benefits and drawbacks, and suggests how the technique would apply to other specific contexts. To write an argumentative essay, international students brief and run a simulation on gun control. They respond to a poll, debate, watch a movie, write letters to editors of local newspapers, read, and play bingo. They also debrief by discussing their performance and working with cartoons. Although the approach failed to provide enough accuracy to generate satisfactory organization and documentation, the level of motivation, metacognitive awareness, and topic authority point positively toward the technique. Student writers searched, organized, planned, and executed the knowledge they co-constructed. If there had been more time to debrief, other form-focused practice could have further improved the final results.

Key Words: academic writing • English for academic purposes (EAP) • experiential-oriented learning • second language acquisition • second language teaching • writing pedagogy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Simulation GamingHome page
R. L. Damron
The life of a simulation: Programmatic promises and pitfalls
Simulation Gaming, March 1, 2008; 39(1): 126 - 136.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Simulation GamingHome page
T. Gastao Salies
Reflections on the GUN CONTROL simulation: Pedagogical implications for EAP writing classes
Simulation Gaming, December 1, 2007; 38(4): 569 - 580.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Simulation GamingHome page
G. Nash
Conference simulation in an English composition course
Simulation Gaming, September 1, 2007; 38(3): 332 - 343.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Simulation GamingHome page
A. Cheng
Symposium article: Simulation-based L2 writing instruction: Enhancement through genre analysis
Simulation Gaming, March 1, 2007; 38(1): 67 - 82.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Simulation GamingHome page
A. Ince
Motivating Students beyond Teacher Expectations
Simulation Gaming, December 1, 2002; 33(4): 481 - 485.
[Abstract] [PDF]