This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Habgood, M. P. J. Articles by Benford, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Endogenous fantasy and learning in digital games

University of Nottingham, UK, mph{at}cs.nott.ac.uk

S. E. Ainsworth

University of Nottingham, UK, Shaaron.Ainsworth{at}nottingham.ac.uk

S. Benford

University of Nottingham, UK, sdb{at}cs.nott.ac.uk

Many people believe that educational games are effective because they motivate children to actively engage in a learning activity as part of playing the game. However, seminal work by Malone, exploring the motivational aspects of digital games, concluded that the educational effectiveness of a digital game depends on the way in which learning content is integrated into the fantasy context of the game. In particular, he claimed that content that is intrinsically related to the fantasy will produce better learning than that which is merely extrinsically related. However, this distinction between intrinsic and extrinsic (or endogenous and exogenous) fantasy is a concept that has developed a confused standing over the following years. This article will address this confusion by providing a review and critique of the empirical and theoretical foundations of endogenous fantasy and its relevance to creating educational digital games. Substantial concerns are raised about the empirical basis of this work and a theoretical critique of endogenous fantasy is offered, concluding that endogenous fantasy is a misnomer, insofar as the "integral and continuing relationship" of fantasy cannot be justified as a critical means of improving the effectiveness of educational digital games. An alternative perspective on the intrinsic integration of learning content is described, incorporating game mechanics, flow, and representations.

Key Words: computer-based learning • computer games • digital games • edutainment • endogenous fantasy • instructional games • intrinsic integration • intrinsic fantasy • intrinsic motivation • video games

Simulation & Gaming, Vol. 36, No. 4, 483-498 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1046878105282276


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. A. Wilson, W. L. Bedwell, E. H. Lazzara, E. Salas, C. S. Burke, J. L. Estock, K. L. Orvis, and C. Conkey Relationships Between Game Attributes and Learning Outcomes: Review and Research Proposals Simulation Gaming, April 1, 2009; 40(2): 217 - 266. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. A. Lynch and R. J. Tunstall When worlds collide: Developing game-design partnerships in universities Simulation Gaming, September 1, 2008; 39(3): 379 - 398. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. R. Hayes and I. A. Games Making Computer Games and Design Thinking: A Review of Current Software and Strategies Games and Culture, July 1, 2008; 3(3-4): 309 - 332. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. L. Lennon Reports & communications: Debriefings of Web-based malaria games Simulation Gaming, September 1, 2006; 37(3): 350 - 356. [Abstract] [PDF]