Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Simulation & Gaming
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1046878107300674v1
38/4/512    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bots, P.
Right arrow Articles by van Daalen, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Functional design of games to support natural resource management policy development

Pieter Bots

CEMAGREF, Montpellier Regional Center, France

Els van Daalen

Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands, C.vanDaalen{at}TUDelft.nl

This article works toward a conceptual framework for designing games to support policy development for managing natural resources. The point of departure for this framework is a typology for functions of games in support of policy. This typology consists of six classes of functions of a policy game: research and analyze policy contexts as systems, design and recommend alternative solutions to a policy problem, provide advice to a client on what strategy to follow in the policy process, mediate between di ferent stakeholders, democratize policy development by actively bringing in stakeholder views, and clarify the values and arguments pertinent to the policy discourse. These functions are illustrated using specific examples of games that have been used in the domain of natural resource management (NRM). The framework discussed in this article may help game designers to match specific game properties (players, roles, rewards, and representations of the NRM context) with the intended function of the game in the policy-development process.

Key Words: alternative solutions • game design • game properties • gaming • mediation • natural resource management (NRM) • policy analysis • policy development • policy games • policy contexts as systems • representations • stakeholder views • strategy • rewards • roles • values clarification

This version was published on December 1, 2007

Simulation & Gaming, Vol. 38, No. 4, 512-532 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1046878107300674
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Simulation GamingHome page
P. Thavikulwat
Social Choice in a Computer-Assisted Simulation
Simulation Gaming, August 1, 2009; 40(4): 488 - 512.
[Abstract] [PDF]