This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1046878107311377v1 39/4/465    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Druckman, D. Articles by Ebner, N. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Onstage or behind the scenes? Relative learning benefits of simulation role-play and design

University of Queensland, Australia, & George Mason University, USA

Noam Ebner

Tel-Hai College, Israel, & Sabanci University, Turkey, noam{at}tachlit.net

In this article, the authors report the results of two experiments that explored hypotheses about the relative learning advantages of role-play and scenario design. The experiments were conducted with similar student populations in Australia and Israel. Using a matched-pairs design, participants were randomly assigned to design and role-play conditions. They worked on their tasks following an hour-long lecture on three negotiation concepts: alternatives, time pressure, and negotiating power. A lecture-only control group was implemented in the Australian experiment. In both experiments, designers, working "behind the scenes," indicated better concept learning in the short run than their role-play counterparts performing "onstage," as well as in comparison with the control group. They showed better understanding of the way the concepts are related and retained the learning gains over time. Moreover, the designers were at least as motivated as role-players and controls and, for the Israel participants, showed more motivation. The results, favoring designers, spread widely across the various questions, asked immediately after the experience and 1 week later: 86% of the answers given favored designers in terms of direction; 52% of these were statistically significant. Implications are discussed for explanatory mechanisms, programmatic research, and teaching/training approaches.

Key Words: concept learning • experiments • matched-pairs • motivation • negotiation • retention • role-playing • scenario design

This version was published on December 1, 2008

Simulation & Gaming, Vol. 39, No. 4, 465-497 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1046878107311377


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?