This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Williams, R. H. Articles by Williams, A. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

In pursuit of peace: Attitudinal and behavioral change with simulations and Multiple Identification Theory

Maple Woods College, USA, mylifesim{at}gmail.com

Alexander Jonathan Williams

William Jewell College, USA, alexwilliams123{at}gmail.com

The authors have developed a theory of simulation game design (Multiple Identification Theory; MIT) based on earlier research and several of their own studies. They utilize this theory to create a simulation game designed to change attitudes from a stance of competition to one of cooperation. Three questionnaires are constructed that measure participants' attitudes toward "cooperation versus competition," "truth and trust versus deception and mistrust," and "social view of conflict versus individual view of conflict." Participants play a simulation designed by the authors in accordance with MIT. All students complete pretests of the attitude questionnaires, play the simulation twice, and then complete posttests of the same questionnaires. In addition to these data, behavioral measures of the players' cooperative or aggressive conduct during the simulations are recorded. Quantitative and qualitative analysis found significant change (in a cooperative direction) for all measures. Robust e fect sizes are also reported. It is believed this study provides encouraging initial support for the e ficacy of simulations designed via MIT in changing attitudes and behavior. It is suggested that such research is of special importance for the promotion of cooperation and peace as alternatives to competition and aggression.

Key Words: attitude change • conflict resolution • cooperation • international relations • Multiple Identification Theory (MIT) • negotiation • political science • psychology • peace studies • simulation games

References

• Advanced negotiation training for natural resource professionals. (n.d.). Retrieved May 12, 2006, from Fort Collins Science Center Online Web site: http://www.fort.usgs.gov/products/training/P201.asp
• Boyer, P., Clark, C.E., Kett, J., Salisbury, N., Sithoff, H., & Woloch, N. (1993). The enduring vision: A history of the American people. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
• Bredemeier, M.A., Bernstein, G., & Oxman, W. (1982). BA FA BA FA and dogmatism/ethnocentrism: A study of attitude change through simulation gaming. Simulation & Gaming, 13(4), 413-436.[Free Full Text]
• Cherryholmes, C. (1966). Some current research on effectiveness of educational simulations: Implications for alternative strategies. American Behavioral Scientist, 10, 3-4.[CrossRef]
• Deutsch, M. (2000). Cooperation and competition. In M. Deutsch & P. T. Coleman (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 21-40). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Dowd, G.E. (1992). A spirited resistance: The North American Indian struggle for unity, 1745-1815. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Eagly, A.H., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitude structure and function. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1; 4th ed.; pp. 269-322). New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1983). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. New York: Penguin.
• Garvey, D.M., & Seiler, W.H. (1968). A study of the effectiveness of different methods of teaching international relations to high school students. In S. S. Boocock & E. O. Schild (Eds.), Simulation games in learning (pp. 269-273). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
• Guetzkow, H., Chadwick, F.A., Brody, R.A., Synder, R.C., & Noel, R. (1963). Simulations in international relations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• International conflict management and resolution. (2006). Retrieved May 9, 2006, from The Carter Center's Conflict Resolution Program Web site: http://cartercenter.org/peaceprograms/program12.htm
• Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (n.d.). Teaching students to be peacemakers. Retrieved May 12, 2006, from http://www.co-operation.org/pages/peacemaker.html
• Lax, D., & Sebenius, J.K. (1986). The manager as negotiator: Bargaining for cooperation and competitive gain. New York: Free Press.
• Nash, G.B., Howe, J.R., & Davis, A.F. (1994). The American people: Creating a nation and a society (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
• NEGOTIATION: The basics. (n.d.). Retrieved May 9, 2006, from Susan Wehrspann & Associates Web site: http://www.sueswebsite.com/training_negotiate_basics.html
• The Nobel Peace Prize. (2005, June 9). Retrieved May 12, 2006, from The Nobel Foundation Web site: http://nobelprize.org/peace/
• Olivas, L., & Newstrom, J.W. (1981). Learning through the use of simulation games. Training and Development Journal, 35(9), 63-66.
• Schumacher, T.R. (1997). Simulation and Attitude Change: Evolving the Research Model. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Vol. 2; pp. 648-654). Wailea, HI: Computer Society Press.
• Sousa, D.A. (1995). How the brain learns. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
• Spangler, B. (2003). Integrative or interest-based bargaining. Retrieved May 12, 2006, from http://www.beyondintractability.org/m/interest-based_bargaining.jsp
• Strategic restructuring: Partnership options for nonprofits. (1998, November). Retrieved May 12, 2006, from La Piana Associates, Inc. Web site: http://www.lapiana.org/resources/tips/negotiations/11_1998.html
• Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223(5), 96-102.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
• Wertheim, E. (n.d.). Negotiations and resolving conflicts: An overview. Retrieved May 9, 2006, from College of Business Administration, Northeastern University Web site: http://web.cba.neu.edu/~ewertheim/interper/negot3.htm
• Williams, R.H. (1980). Attitude change and simulation games: the ability of a simulation game to change attitudes when structured in accordance with either the cognitive dissonance or incentive models of attitude change. Simulation & Games: An International Journal, 11(2), 177-196.
• Williams, R.H., McCandless, P.H., Hobb, D.A., & Williams, S.A. (1986). Changing attitudes with "identification theory." Simulation & Games: An International Journal, 17(1), 25-43.
• Williams, R.H., & Williams, S.A. (1987). Level of identification as a predictor of attitude change. Simulation & Games: An International Journal, 18(4), 471-487.
• World Citizens for Peace. (2006, January). Retrieved May 12, 2006, from http://www.wcpeace.org/

This version was published on December 1, 2007

Simulation & Gaming, Vol. 38, No. 4, 453-471 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1046878107300675


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Williams, R. H. Articles by Williams, A. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?